The Definitive Guide toAI Data Centers
Ask the GuideAboutAccount
Guide › Numbers register › Claim

Security deposit in Tri-State's rejected 2025 large-load tariff proposal, paired with a proposed 15-year term

$2.7M / MWobserved

Value kindobserved — Reported measurements, counts, and specifications keep the precision and scope stated by their source; an exact specification is not treated as a range.
ScopeAmount reported for Tri-State's rejected 2025 large-load tariff proposal, not an adopted tariff requirement or a typical US large-load deposit
CaveatAmount reported for the rejected 2025 proposal, not an adopted tariff requirement. A revised HILT was conditionally approved on August 14, 2026, and a compliance revision was filed September 9, 2026; the cited records do not establish the revised security or term provisions.
As of2025
SourceThe Colorado Sun, report of Tri-State's rejected 2025 large-load tariff proposal (proposed large-load tariff and FERC rejection). · Tri-State large-load terms; $2.7M per project MW, 15-year contract, and minimum energy/demand charges
Reviewchecking…review by 2027-01-17 · fast cadence
Recorded changeslast 2026-10-05 · 2 revisions tracked
Claim idsecurity-deposit-demanded-under-a-us-large-load

Where the guide uses it

← Full numbers register — every date-stamped figure in the guide, with revision history.